Subject:
|
Re: Vote against/for...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 06:12:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
612 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > Like I said elsewhere, I fear for the country. Having the House, Senate and
> > > White House all controlled by the same party (either one of the current
> > two, take your pick) is bad bad bad news.
> > As far as you know, which isn't far.
>
> None of us is blessed with omniescence, of course, as far as I can tell.
That was my point.
> And we're all limited by our horizons, and our companions.
> But I'm on a mountaintop with Thomas Jefferson, while you're down in a hog
> wallow with John Ashcroft, so I'm pretty comfortable that I can see a lot
> farther ahead than you can. And what I see scares the jeepers out of me.
>
> If it's any comfort to you, though, you're in the majority.
*You* could be in the majority too if you'd pull your head out and join the
Republican party to work for getting liberatarian agendas implemented, rather
than support the go-nowhere, impotent Losertarian party. You are not on a
mountaintop and your not with Thomas Jefferson. You are at the Jetson's home
and you are walking Astro: "Jane! Stop this crazy thing!
The Republicans are *far* from being perfect, but at this point, they are a FAR
cry better than the Dems. It's about getting things done. The Republicans
have some elbow room to start getting some positive things accomplished. I'm
hoping for the ending of federal income tax, or at least the death tax. Let's
roll.
-John
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) Right. I'd be happy to see some of those things too, dingus. If you think the war will pay for itself, or be a short easy to pay for war; then you need to reduce your lithium intake. Bush will raise the national debt paying off his (...) (22 years ago, 7-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) Yeah, Larry--you should join the NRA/Christian Coalition/Enron whore known as the GOP. And John, since you're fond of overlooking reality when it favors your agenda, let's not forget that you can make no true claims of majority. Voter turnout (...) (22 years ago, 7-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) Slinging names is not the way to keep this debate where it needs to be. Because when you use even a mild one like "Losertarian" you enable ill mannered rabble rousers to do the same (in kind, but far worse in degree). I find the use of the (...) (22 years ago, 7-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) Perhaps instead of spending so much money on fighting a war, the ruling party over there in the USA should spend some more money on education so that you could learn the difference between your and you're. Maybe if there wasn't so much pig (...) (22 years ago, 9-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) None of us is blessed with omniescence, of course, as far as I can tell. And we're all limited by our horizons, and our companions. But I'm on a mountaintop with Thomas Jefferson, while you're down in a hog wallow with John Ashcroft, so I'm (...) (22 years ago, 6-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
161 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
