Subject:
|
Re: Vote against/for...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 05:53:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
589 times
|
| |
|
|
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> Yikes! Lets just throw in a "Sich heil" for fun too.
What fun is that, except to a German after reading your malapropism:-)
> > As far as how we "do things in our country"-- we are the model, the freest
> Freest? What do you mean freest, shouldn't that be simply free.
As in show me a freer country than the US (it's comparative)
> Why are there
> limitations placed on freedom. Granted as mind bogglingly naive as your rant
> is, you have the right to speak it. Of course as recent news shows, some
> people who disagree with Bush are not quite so lucky. That of and in itself
> completly invalidates every word out of Dubbya's mouth in my opinion. It
> seems to me that you are so wrapped up in the War on Terrorism propaganda,
> (hey I fell for some of it too) but you are missing the most evil threat our
> country has ever faced. Coruption from within.
I doubt any "coruption (sic) from within" will attempt mass murder upon the
citizens of the United States.
I think you are the naive one if you think that the muslim terrorist threat
will just go away and that 9-11 was merely some blip on some global events
screen. I really don't feel like saying "I told you so" after some terrorist
denotates a nuclear or biological weapon on US soil. I'd rather have President
Bush thwart such efforts *before* they happen, thankyouverymuch.
> The fact that millions of Americans do not take up arms
> against such blatant acts of Government Terror, is disgusting at best.
I honestly don't know to what you are referring-- and who are these unfortunate
people who disagree with Bush recently in the news? (Unless you are referring
to the Dems after Tuesday;-)
-John
> -Mike Petrucelli
> (who still can not figure out the idiotic revisionist policy of eliminating
> all references of the two towers in New York)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) The people of a country are either free or they are not, there is no middle ground. (...) Well if we let them get away with illegal property seizure, illegal imprisonment, and other blatantly obvious facist acts, who is to say they won't try. (...) (22 years ago, 7-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) Yikes! Lets just throw in a "Sich heil" for fun too. (...) Freest? What do you mean freest, shouldn't that be simply free. Why are there limitations placed on freedom. Granted as mind bogglingly naive as your rant is, you have the right to (...) (22 years ago, 7-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
161 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
