Subject:
|
Re: Vote against/for...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 22:19:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
666 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
>
>
> > Yikes! Lets just throw in a "Sich heil" for fun too.
>
> What fun is that, except to a German after reading your malapropism:-)
>
> > > As far as how we "do things in our country"-- we are the model, the freest
>
> > Freest? What do you mean freest, shouldn't that be simply free.
>
> As in show me a freer country than the US (it's comparative)
The people of a country are either free or they are not, there is no middle
ground.
>
> > Why are there
> > limitations placed on freedom. Granted as mind bogglingly naive as your rant
> > is, you have the right to speak it. Of course as recent news shows, some
> > people who disagree with Bush are not quite so lucky. That of and in itself
> > completly invalidates every word out of Dubbya's mouth in my opinion. It
> > seems to me that you are so wrapped up in the War on Terrorism propaganda,
> > (hey I fell for some of it too) but you are missing the most evil threat our
> > country has ever faced. Coruption from within.
>
> I doubt any "coruption (sic) from within" will attempt mass murder upon the
> citizens of the United States.
Well if we let them get away with illegal property seizure, illegal
imprisonment, and other blatantly obvious facist acts, who is to say they won't
try.
>
> I think you are the naive one if you think that the muslim terrorist threat
> will just go away and that 9-11 was merely some blip on some global events
> screen. I really don't feel like saying "I told you so" after some terrorist
> denotates a nuclear or biological weapon on US soil. I'd rather have • President
> Bush thwart such efforts *before* they happen, thankyouverymuch.
Who would be stupid enough to try that after we made an example of the Taliban?
>
> > The fact that millions of Americans do not take up arms
> > against such blatant acts of Government Terror, is disgusting at best.
>
> I honestly don't know to what you are referring-- and who are these • unfortunate
> people who disagree with Bush recently in the news? (Unless you are referring
> to the Dems after Tuesday;-)
>
> -John
I am referring to the people who choose to excersise their RIGHT to peacefully
protest Bush's actions, only to find themselves imprisoned for a few days
without being charged, given the right to a phone call, or legal counsel.
This form of Government Terrorism is far more dangerous than any group of
people whose main source of organization has already been eliminated.
-Mike Petrucelli
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) What fun is that, except to a German after reading your malapropism:-) (...) As in show me a freer country than the US (it's comparative) (...) I doubt any "coruption (sic) from within" will attempt mass murder upon the citizens of the United (...) (22 years ago, 7-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
161 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
