 | | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing" —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes: <snip> No argument with any of that (you'll never see ME arguing the case that a show "ought to be banned" rather than "just turn the channel on it" so the off button is the completely appropriate (...) (22 years ago, 5-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing" —Ed Jones
|
| | | | (...) Hmm, "misconstrued" and a "drive by". How quickly the name calling starts. If you had read my response down a few threads, you would have seen that I thought this was a fresh debate topic, not a follow-up post with a new heading to a previous (...) (22 years ago, 5-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing" —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) And later on in a different post... (...) You are absolutely correct. Start by looking in the mirror, Ed. I'll stick with my original assessment. Your first post to this thread was a driveby. (22 years ago, 6-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing" —Ed Jones
|
| | | | | | (...) The difference, Larry, and it is a huge one, is that I did not name call. Read what you have quoted - The first two words - "Your statement..." I responded that your statement "is blatant snobbery, self-serving, judgemental without proof, and (...) (22 years ago, 6-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Ed's opinion of Larry and other trivia (was: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing") —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) That's not exactly fair, Ed. Misconstrue isn't a name at all, it's Larry's assertion that you misunderstood his point (in this case possibly willfully). And if you consider how your note looked, I don't think "drive by" was really (...) (22 years ago, 6-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Cost Of Living (was Re: Ed's opinion of Larry and other trivia) —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | While the schools themselves may not need money (that's debatable for many areas - if a school is falling apart from lack of money for basic maintenance along with much-needed upgrades, it needs money), the teachers do. If a teacher cannot afford to (...) (22 years ago, 9-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Cost Of Living (was Re: Ed's opinion of Larry and other trivia) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) There are certainly places where teachers should be making more money. Schools though, waste huge sums of money in an attempt to educate. There are (private) schools that do a better job for less money without depriving the teachers. Maybe the (...) (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
