To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 17841
17840  |  17842
Subject: 
Re: This should be required reading for this group...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 25 Sep 2002 22:31:17 GMT
Viewed: 
356 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes:
Certainly mocking, but your target is ambiguous.

Not that ambiguous I'd hoped.  I was just being evil.

In part, I quoted something from the last day or so of this newsgroup's
postings -- I'd not want to call it out in particular beyond what I have done.

In the main, I think your purpose and article choice was on target.  Sorry
for the digression.

-- Hop-Frog



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: This should be required reading for this group...
 
(...) You know, I honestly can't tell if you're being sarcastic here, or not. Certainly mocking, but your target is ambiguous. If you honestly feel the link I posted is worse than useless, why not just say so? James (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

9 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR