Debate : 17834


Off-Topic / Debate / 17834	17833 \| 17835

Subject:	Re: This should be required reading for this group...
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Wed, 25 Sep 2002 19:17:02 GMT
Viewed:	314 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes: > Certainly the strong disconnect between reasons and conclusions has been > observed here, in various parties. What? I don't get it. So, like a chess game, after a certain number of similar moves, it must end. I'm done here. O wait, you mean I wasn't playing chess? It wasn't clever or interesting? It wasn't even a stalemate? I don't even know what I am doing? Flatter myself much...? -- Hop-Frog

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: This should be required reading for this group...
(...) You know, I honestly can't tell if you're being sarcastic here, or not. Certainly mocking, but your target is ambiguous. If you honestly feel the link I posted is worse than useless, why not just say so? James (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: This should be required reading for this group...
(...) It makes a handy and compelling virtual stick to beat unreasonable people with? And at times, pretty much everyone in here is guilty of unreasoning. Certainly the strong disconnect between reasons and conclusions has been observed here, in (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

9 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search