To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 17837
17836  |  17838
Subject: 
Re: This should be required reading for this group...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 25 Sep 2002 20:06:18 GMT
Viewed: 
271 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes:

Certainly the strong disconnect between reasons and conclusions has been
observed here, in various parties.  Present company (usually) excepted. ;p

But not always, regrettably. Yes, I agree. It is good to be able to remind
people that debate involves reason or it isn't debate. Interesting
discussion perhaps but not debate.

We have a number of high quality debaters here and I think we all enjoy
discussing things amongst ourselves (if I may be so bold as to include
myself), but as you say, we also have some that are not quite up to the same
level and discourse with them is rather less enjoyable. (except perhaps on
different levels, such as those that give enjoyment in seeing demolition
derby matches)

Note that being a good debater does not necessarily make one a good person
in and of itself, nor is the converse true. There are many good people here
and elsewhere that aren't good reasoners or good debaters.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: This should be required reading for this group...
 
(...) It makes a handy and compelling virtual stick to beat unreasonable people with? And at times, pretty much everyone in here is guilty of unreasoning. Certainly the strong disconnect between reasons and conclusions has been observed here, in (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

9 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR