Debate : 17835


Off-Topic / Debate / 17835	17834 \| 17836

Subject:	Re: This should be required reading for this group...
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Wed, 25 Sep 2002 19:23:10 GMT
Viewed:	324 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes: > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes: > > Certainly the strong disconnect between reasons and conclusions has been > > observed here, in various parties. > > What? I don't get it. So, like a chess game, after a certain number of > similar moves, it must end. I'm done here. > > O wait, you mean I wasn't playing chess? It wasn't clever or interesting? > It wasn't even a stalemate? I don't even know what I am doing? > > Flatter myself much...? You know, I honestly can't tell if you're being sarcastic here, or not. Certainly mocking, but your target is ambiguous. If you honestly feel the link I posted is worse than useless, why not just say so? James

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: This should be required reading for this group...
(...) Not that ambiguous I'd hoped. I was just being evil. In part, I quoted something from the last day or so of this newsgroup's postings -- I'd not want to call it out in particular beyond what I have done. In the main, I think your purpose and (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: This should be required reading for this group...
(...) What? I don't get it. So, like a chess game, after a certain number of similar moves, it must end. I'm done here. O wait, you mean I wasn't playing chess? It wasn't clever or interesting? It wasn't even a stalemate? I don't even know what I am (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

9 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search