 | | Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?) —Jesse Long
|
| | | Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message news:37C1467E.E8D0D6...ger.net... (...) How? All you do is sit around hacking away at other people's views without offering any workable alternatives (much like you do with your politics). How much (...) (25 years ago, 24-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?) —Simon Robinson
|
| | | | (...) Trouble is it doesn't look to me like it really is 'God's standards' your pushing. It looks to me more like a set of standards that *PEOPLE* have come up with by following through one particular, and highly questionable, interpretation of the (...) (25 years ago, 24-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?) —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Simon Robinson writes: <snipped above> (...) <snip> (...) I can explain them as far as the context of "the reward he got for his wickedness" if we consider the verse after Acts 1:18, and the verses following Matthew 27:5, (...) (25 years ago, 24-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?) —Simon Robinson
|
| | | | | (...) they (...) following (...) more (...) included (...) <big snip about story of Judas dying> (...) Well I have to admit to being impressed by the effort you've made to reconcile those accounts. Trouble is there's a point where what you are doing (...) (25 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?) —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | (...) In context, I just tried to follow the accounts to show where and how they relate to each other. And basically I listed the obvious points made in the verses. (...) Obviously I have prior beliefs: everyone does. To be perfectly fair my (...) (25 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?) —Simon Robinson
|
| | | | | | | (...) I (...) Yes you're right that we all inevitably get influenced by our prior beliefs. We also all have our own ideas about what counts as reasonable - and in most cases we'd be hard put to explain why we draw the line where we do. I *think* the (...) (25 years ago, 27-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?) —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | | | | (...) No, you're right. It could been easily described in one place. I do not attempt to explain or to justify why there's more than one account - there just is. Given that both accounts are correct, I'm merely attempting to show that they do not (...) (25 years ago, 27-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?) —Simon Robinson
|
| | | | | | | | Tom, [I've snipped and shifted around the order of your last posting in order to put my replies read in a more logical order] (...) No, where appropriate I'm arguing on the basis that it is in order to see where that leads. That doesn't mean I'm (...) (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?) —Jesse Long
|
| | | | | | Tom McDonald <radiotitan@spamcake.yahoo.com> wrote in message news:FH2x8n.Bq0@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) Do you want the "everything's always right, exactly right, literally right" explanation? If so, then he hanged himself, fell off the tree (...) (25 years ago, 27-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | (canceled) —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?) —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | | (...) Back then, it did matter, because it was blood money and the religious leaders wanted nothing to do with it. But as far as we're concerned today, most of us don't care. It's only a hill I'll defend as long as some see it as [part of] concrete (...) (25 years ago, 28-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | <FH2x8n.Bq0@lugnet.com> <FH3ynz.7no@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Perhaps he hanged himself by his intestines. You know, he climbs to the top of the lone tree in the potter's field, (...) (25 years ago, 27-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?) —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | | (...) Ow! That sounds like some kinda home surgery.. :-O -Tom McD. when replying, "You are part of the Spamcake Alliance and a traitor! Take her away!!" (25 years ago, 28-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?) —Jesse Long
|
| | | | Simon Robinson <simon@simonrobinson.com> wrote in message news:FHAL2G.JHJ@lugnet.com... (...) I guess I missed the gist of the message. Besides, in the end this isn't about deduction, it's about faith. I can't prove there's anything special about (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
