To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 17515
17514  |  17516
Subject: 
Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 06:18:43 GMT
Viewed: 
2410 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:

> So you are part of a well regulated militia are you?

I am. I'm able bodied, male, a citizen and have had training on how to use
my gun. That's what well regulated militia meant when those words were chosen.

> That's the only way
> you should have a gun--if you're not part of the militia, then the 2nd
> ammendment doesn't apply to you.

Asked and answered, long long ago. Read the federalist papers instead of
getting your learning from "the West Wing"...



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
 
(...) PS I don't think able bodied or male are still legitimate requirements, although they may have made sense back then. (24 years ago, 11-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
 
(...) Aren't we a little more mature than this? 'He who carries the biggest stick rules the sandbox...'? I obey the law *because* it's the law, not because the cops have guns. It's the mature, 'evolved', inherently *right* way of doing things, such (...) (24 years ago, 11-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR