 | | Re: tolerant morals are a blueprint to disaster (but I don't force a change) —David Koudys
|
| | | (...) Oh I so agree with you. Parents... sex... Ick!!! Dave K (22 years ago, 16-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: tolerant morals are a blueprint to disaster (but I don't force a change) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) I'm not sure what degree of humor is intended by either of you, but I've heard that before and bet you're both wrong. If you had been raised seeing sexual expression of your parents love as a normal event, you would not be squicked by the (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: tolerant morals are a blueprint to disaster (but I don't force a change) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) I was indeed being facetious, but I can see the issue you're addressing. I note that you're already putting a spin on it that presupposes your view to be right and mine to be wrong; specifically, you are saying that your favorable emotional (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: tolerant morals are a blueprint to disaster (but I don't force a change) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | (...) Actually, I didn't. I said that I "bet" that you would feel differently if things had been different. (...) That would be fine with me. But I think the "ickyness" that we feel when considering our parents having sex is based on having sex be (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: tolerant morals are a blueprint to disaster (but I don't force a change) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) Darn it Chris, I'm trying to pick a fight here. Rise to it, man! Rise to it! (...) That would indeed be a strange lab to perform. Dave! (22 years ago, 17-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: tolerant morals are a blueprint to disaster (but I don't force a change) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) K, this one made me laugh out loud. That would be something to see (but probably still have a high 'Ick" factor). Again, something that others can do, but I probably would *ahem* abstain... Is like the new law in Ontario which states that (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
