To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 17252
17251  |  17253
Subject: 
Re: tolerant morals are a blueprint to disaster (but I don't force a change)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 16 Jul 2002 21:37:40 GMT
Viewed: 
6324 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:

>  I note that you're already putting a spin on it that presupposes your view
> to be right and mine to be wrong; specifically, you are saying that your
> favorable emotional response that directly affects only you is correct but
> my unfavorable emotional response that directly affects only me is not.

Actually, I didn't.  I said that I "bet" that you would feel differently if
things had been different.

> Regardless of the love present in or absent from my parents' coitus, what if
> the simple spectacle of them is aesthetically unappealing to me on a visual
> level?

That would be fine with me.  But I think the "ickyness" that we feel when
considering our parents having sex is based on having sex be such a taboo
subject and our holding our parents out to be different from everyone else.  If
we'd grown up watching them have sex, I think it would go a long way to
normalizing sexuality (which I _think_ would be a good thing) and removing our
icky gut reaction.  But this is all guesswork on my part.  I haven't tested the
theory to any real extent.

Chris



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: tolerant morals are a blueprint to disaster (but I don't force a change)
 
(...) Darn it Chris, I'm trying to pick a fight here. Rise to it, man! Rise to it! (...) That would indeed be a strange lab to perform. Dave! (24 years ago, 17-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: tolerant morals are a blueprint to disaster (but I don't force a change)
 
(...) I was indeed being facetious, but I can see the issue you're addressing. I note that you're already putting a spin on it that presupposes your view to be right and mine to be wrong; specifically, you are saying that your favorable emotional (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

225 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR