 | | Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
|
(...) Grow up. (...) Do you really think so? I really don't. The Intifada is a result of (...) What we are talking about here are two separate issues, which have been uniquely intertwined by Islamic extremists. First, you have the issue of autonomy (...) (22 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
|
(...) lol. A very adult statement! (...) Thanks for your view! (...) On Israel's terms? (...) ...and the way to cut-off Hammas is with the education of their support, not killing civilians. But remember, there are extremists on both sides... and (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
|
(...) Well, I am already being proven right, because it appears even today that Israel will refuse to allow the creation of a Palestinian state that is lead by murderous thugs like Arafat and his terrorist organizations. And frankly, I don't blame (...) (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
|
(...) This is not consistent with my understandment of the recent events. Are you refering to the decision by the dominant Israeli party Likud to forever oppose the creation of an independent Palestinian state on the West Bank? Apparantly, Sharon is (...) (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
|
Fredrik, I agree with what you say relating to Likud. John, I would like to add that just because the your views and Likud's concur it does not mean that anyone is "proven right". Scott A (...) (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
