 | | Re: Cease fire (was: Re: Peace in the Mid-East?) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) I happen to agree with this viewpoint.It's nice and tidy and has a nice absolute finality to it. No equivocating. But it has a big problem. It opens one up to questioning one's own motives. People who want to assail one's position will (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Cease fire (was: Re: Peace in the Mid-East?) —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) Isn't that merely deflection; skirting the issue at hand? I talk about Palestininan terrorism, and they shift the focus to *my* supposed support of terrorism. How is that germane? Merely as an attempt to discredit me as a hypocrite? (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Cease fire (was: Re: Peace in the Mid-East?) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Oh ya, I agree. But it's what you're up against here in this newsgroup. Until you can make this case (at the meta level), you're stuck. And no one here has been at all effective at making that case in the past. c.f. what happened to me when I (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Cease fire (was: Re: Peace in the Mid-East?) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) John, You said: "Anyone who supports the actions of terrorists is just as culpable as the terrorists themselves." I demonstrated that your tax dollars and your countrymen support "terror". I also shattered you allusion that Israel is a nation (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Cease fire (was: Re: Peace in the Mid-East?) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) That's odd, it’s my understanding that it is against the law to fund raise for the IRA in the USA... I may be wrong(?). By "repressive governments", do you include those who imprison suspects without trial? Interestingly, the UK will not hand (...) (23 years ago, 1-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
