| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
>
> > For instance, Chris Weeks and I are at
> > odds 95% of the time (I guess that's sort of a pun, if Larry's reading), but
> > it's the moments of convergence that fascinate me.
>
> Gosh. 95%? I didn't know it was so high.
That was more of a hyperbole, really, and sort of a nod to your superior
grasp of statistics. Anyway, I'm sure most of our disagreements are merely
online--I think in the real world our views would be much more compatible.
> I mean...I think of myself as a socialist libertarian... and I'm trying to
> figure out what I mean by that.
See? That's my point exactly--I'd call myself a libertarian socialist, so
we're obviously diametrically opposed. 8^)
No offense meant in any case; I was simply trying to show the value of
differing opinion as it manifests in the group.
Thanks,
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Debate
|
| (...) You said something to that effect a couple of days ago. It's funny -- I consider myself a complete amature when it comes to statistics. I'm comfy applying and analyzing stats to social-science kind of situations and I can use SAS, SPSS, or (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Debate
|
| (...) Gosh. 95%? I didn't know it was so high. It seems like the only way you could really disagree with me that much was to have incredibly middle of the road views. I mostly radical stances but in all "directions." Is that how you would (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
