| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> Anyway, the coolest thing for me about .debate is that sometimes I find
> myself in agreement on unexpected issues with people with whom I am
> ordinarily in sharp disagreement. For instance, Chris Weeks and I are at
> odds 95% of the time (I guess that's sort of a pun, if Larry's reading), but
> it's the moments of convergence that fascinate me.
Gosh. 95%? I didn't know it was so high. It seems like the only way you
could really disagree with me that much was to have incredibly middle of the
road views. I mostly radical stances but in all "directions." Is that how you
would characterize yourself? I mean...I think of myself as a socialist
libertarian...and I'm trying to figure out what I mean by that.
later,
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Debate
|
| (...) That was more of a hyperbole, really, and sort of a nod to your superior grasp of statistics. Anyway, I'm sure most of our disagreements are merely online--I think in the real world our views would be much more compatible. (...) See? That's my (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Debate
|
| (...) The "need" for OT.Debate has often been discussed, and good points have been raised both pro and con. I suppose the bottom line is that OT squabbles will arise in most of the LUGNET discussion groups as a matter of course, so it's helpful to (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
