Subject:
|
Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Jul 1999 17:00:46 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
c576653@cclabs.missouri.*StopSpammers*edu
|
Viewed:
|
1259 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> As I've said before, I feel that if people are debating whether the post
> office can be privatized, they've conceded the easier to privatize
> things, and if they're debating whether police and defense can be,
> they've conceded EVERYTHING else, as those are the very hardest.
I think environmental protection and animal "rights" are harder than
defense to privatize. In fact, I think defense is relatively easy.
Probably easier than roads.
--
Sincerely,
Christopher L. Weeks
central Missouri, USA
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?]
|
| (...) In one sense, yes. In another, hell no. Defense _cannot_ be privatised, _especially_ not in Liberdystopia. The then-privatised DoD would not only no longer be under direct government control, but it would have to compete with others. I for one (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?]
|
| An unlimited democracy with no bounds as to what the majority can decide is indeed flawed. Further, it's unworkable beyond a certain size, and leads to factionalism. A constitutionally limited representative or republican democracy is much better. (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
433 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
