 | | Re: An armed society... —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (...) Well, not according to the 2nd Amendment, The Constitution in general, or in any litigation thus far brought before the Supreme Court. More specifically, the government's authority to regulate the ownership of arms by private citizens has (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: An armed society... —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Um, I was kind of playing, but what do you mean? I think the 2nd is pretty clear on the matter. The issue of how the Supreme Court has allowed the curtailing of our constitutional rights is interesting, but I'm not sure that I'm ready to (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: An armed society... —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) But according to the Constitution, it is the Court that is empowered to interpret the law. (...) I've had a small and far-too-late epiphany on this matter, or at least on how to articulate my feelings about it, so I think I might finally have (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: An armed society... —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) Dave, your post is too full of errors to take on as a whole so I picked just this one spot. I think it is also an erroneous statement. I could certainly mount arguments that would show that the second amendment is indeed a protection to keep (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: An armed society... —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Then it's odd that the NRA, the most vociferous and organized proponents of so-called gun rights, has never brought a case successfully before the Supreme Court, despite numerous opportunities to try. You are of course correct regarding the (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: An armed society... —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) I have posted about the Ashwander Doctrine before -- read it and connect the dots, pretty please. (URL) the record, I am not exactly a card-carrying NRA kinda guy...I barely care what they do. (...) No, taxation is Constitutional because of (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Definitions (was: An armed society...) —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Hmmmf. Doesn't that definition also depend on the meaning of "citizen"? ROSCO (nit-picking again) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Definitions (was: An armed society...) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | (...) In a way that's my point, ultimately one has to admit that one knows precisely what a word means and stop playing the semantics game. The semantics game is almost endless if the point is to NEVER reach accord. My point was to show that there (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: An armed society... —Kirby Warden
|
| | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes: <snip> (...) I am SO glad someone FINALLY brought this up! The Federal Reserve and the 16th Amendment were beget by President Wilson. Mr. Wilson was heavily influenced by a friend of the (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: An armed society... —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | (...) Wouldn't it be nice if Americans woke up before they have to learn the hard way. Well Thomas Jefferson at least knew that we would one day reach the point where the Declaration of Independance would need to be re-issued. It is nice to know (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: An armed society... —Kirby Warden
|
| | | | (...) amen (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
