To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 15570
15569  |  15571
Subject: 
Re: Definitions (was: An armed society...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 24 Jan 2002 02:49:41 GMT
Viewed: 
1124 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
Hmmmf. Doesn't that definition also depend on the meaning of "citizen"?

In a way that's my point, ultimately one has to admit that one knows
precisely what a word means and stop playing the semantics game.  The
semantics game is almost endless if the point is to NEVER reach accord.  My
point was to show that there is already accord with the meaning of the
second amendment, whatever the Supreme Court may or may not choose to decide
on the matter.

-- Hop-Frog



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Definitions (was: An armed society...)
 
(...) Hmmmf. Doesn't that definition also depend on the meaning of "citizen"? ROSCO (nit-picking again) (22 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

179 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR