To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 15572
15571  |  15573
Subject: 
Re: An armed society...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 24 Jan 2002 03:49:49 GMT
Viewed: 
1100 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:

<snip>

BTW, while you are reading the Constitution, explain this to me from Art. I,
sect. 10:

"No State shall ... make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in
Payment of Debts;"

or this, from Art. 1, Sect. 8 states:
"The Congress shall have Power ... To coin Money, regulate the Value
thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;"

Last time I looked, I have no gold or silver in my pockets.  Federal Reserve
Notes are deemed legal tender.  The Federal govt. does not coin gold or
silver as they are obligated to do under the Constitution.

The Federal Reserve, though seemingly regulated by the federal govt. and
executive appt.s, is still just a private corporation -- I have never seen a
refutal of that simple fact.  The other simple fact is that under the
Constitution the Federal govt. is burdened with the task of regulating the
monetary system -- not passing it off to a private entity for their private
profit.


I am SO glad someone FINALLY brought this up!  The Federal Reserve and the
16th Amendment were beget by President Wilson.  Mr. Wilson was heavily
influenced by a friend of the Rothschilds.  The Rothschilds were (perhaps
still are?) mostly in control of Europe's economy via their banks.  Letting
the banks control citizen's money was the gravest mistake our "esteemed"
leadership ever made.  But, as I understand it, everything fell through as
planned (a government plan that worked?  Whoa!).

I mention it not because I wish to change the subject, but to show how
widespread the corruption is -- and usually without anyone having noticed it
AT ALL!  Did you notice it?  Shouldn't something be done about it?  I have
no faith that anything will be done about it.


Not so long as the CFR (Council of Foriegn Relations) maintains control of
the money and the information.  Thankfully the internet seems to have been
an unforseen glich, as information about the CFR and other organizations of
that ilk (Trilateral Organization, Anti Defimation League) are available
with a limited search.

I am tired of the ignorance and hypocrisy of modern america.  I'd rather
live somewhere where everyone at least acknowledges the corruption of the
system rather than somehow try to justify every stupid thing the system
does.  The idea of the U.S. is a good one.  But it requires a tireless and
educated citizenry, which is no longer viable in an age of increasing
specialization in almost everything -- few could be expected to know
everything that would be expected of them.  I doubt the U.S. will last in
its intended, or current form, very much longer.

I know this because we are arguing about whether or not a FUNDAMENTAL right
even exists, or is in fact protected.  Imagine how many bigger issues fair
in our system...

-- Hop-Frog

Also of interest, though I have yet to do a decent search of this, is that
Rockefeller also befriended the Rothschilds.  He is responsible for
establishing the Trilateral Organization, was a member of the CFR, and also
donated the land where the U.N. building now sits.

People really should look into the CFR.  It's frightening how many known
people are members.  Virtually every individual in congress is/was a member
of the CFR.  Every major media outlet is also owned and operated by members
of the CFR.  Don't think for a moment that these people are in it for the
benefit of THE PEOPLE.  They're in it for the power.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: An armed society...
 
(...) I have posted about the Ashwander Doctrine before -- read it and connect the dots, pretty please. (URL) the record, I am not exactly a card-carrying NRA kinda guy...I barely care what they do. (...) No, taxation is Constitutional because of (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

179 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR