Subject:
|
Re: The Scott and Larry Show: Call for a Series Finale
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:38:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
279 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Tim Courtney writes:
> > > Admins, please, this has to stop. Despite the expressions of disgust over
> > > Scott and Larry's mudslinging from many Lugnetters, they continue it with no
> > > regard. • [snip]
> > Do you seriously think I should let Larry level all sort of spurious
> > allegations against me? Really?
>
> Yes!!!!!!!!!!
> YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES
> -YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YE
> S-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-Y
> ES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-YES-
> YES-YES!
No. Larry was being strange over the weekend. I was genuinely surprised by
some of what he was posting. I could not let is slide.
> Just like Larry should fail to be baited by your antics.
>
> > > Scott should be given a stern warning and 24 hours to straighten up his act,
> > > or face banishment from off-topic.debate and be prohibited from responding
> > > to anything Larry posts.
> >
> > I have broken no rules here. None. If I have, I will apologise.
>
> We are very familiar with your almost Prussian rules fetish. What Tim is
> talking about are subliminal rules of human conduct. The fact that you break
> them routinely is why you disgust me.
Chris, I try my best to be good. I try not to prod until I am prodded. There
are all sorts of things which go on here that I do not care for all that
much. At least I try to keep my angst inside this group. I'm sorry I disgust
you. I'm sorry you think I'm a prick.
>
> > > Scott is obviously more culpable than Larry in
> > > these arguments
> >
> > That is not my view.
>
> I didn't get the idea that he was soliciting your view.
... and perhaps I was not looking for yours? :)
But you are correct, Tim appears to have a rather unique view of life (read
his most recent post here). He has chastised me once before for daring to
reply to one of his posts (he did not want anyone to answer it apparently).
Perhaps he will do so again.
Who knows? Who cares?
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
