To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14390
14389  |  14391
Subject: 
Re: Future of Humanity (was: lotsa stuff)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 29 Oct 2001 20:51:22 GMT
Viewed: 
3050 times
  
Ross Crawford wrote:

> > This is an interesting point. It is a generaisation, but in the UK low
> > income families tend to have more kids than higher earners. Many couples
> > (married or otherwsie) decide to have only one or no kids at all. If we
> > assume (again a generisation) that low income familes have lower levels of
> > intelligence (measured by lower levels of educational attainment) is our
> > gene pool geing skewed the wrong way?
> 
> Is there a "wrong way"?

I would think that most people with at least middling intelligence would tend to
agree that decreasing the overall intelligence level of our species is the "wrong
way".

Do you have a reason to think that decreasing our species intelligence is the right
way to go?



--
| Tom Stangl, iPlanet Web Server Technical Support
|       Sun Microsystems Customer Service
|   iPlanet Support - http://www.iplanet.com/support/
| Please do not associate my personal views with my employer



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Future of Humanity (was: lotsa stuff)
 
(...) Though admittedly a generalization, this trend in intelligence:breeding rate is based on an evolutionarily insignificant stretch of time. Further, even in the hypothetical example, the judging of intelligence based on academic achievement (...) (25 years ago, 29-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Future of Humanity (was: lotsa stuff)
 
(...) to (...) "wrong (...) That may be so, but I would think that most people who have a middling understanding of evolution would agree that intelligence has little (if any) effect on it. (...) right (...) No. Read the question again. I was (...) (25 years ago, 29-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Future of Humanity (was: lotsa stuff)
 
(...) either (...) in (...) Is there a "wrong way"? ROSCO (25 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR