Subject:
|
Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 20:42:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
505 times
|
| |
|
|
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>
> > Yes indeed, very thoughtful of you.
>
> (sorry, forgot the Sarcasm on and Sarcasm off warnings)... that is, unless
> you plan to *never* post about any of the topics you've posted about already.
I feel my sarcasm was well placed since your initial response made it clear
that you already stated your stance on this topic in previous discussions in
this group, hence nothing that has been presented ever since has swayed your
opinion. So what more do you need to say or add, other than to repeat what
you've said before?
> I guess I am *shocked* that you'd try to stifle discussion that way, Dan.
Oh, boo hoo. Look, I'm assuming you've said your part as best as you can
but, if you feel your argument needs some touching up or clarification now,
you have my heartiest blessing. But I cannot help but feel skeptical about
whether you're going to be open-minded about this. Still, if you feel you've
previously stated your case clearly before (which I'm assuming you have
because, to your credit, you're pretty thorough) then you could be gracious
enough to offer us the links to your old posts on this topic. Those who are
interested in your opinions will read them, those who aren't won't.
> But I can see why, because the underlying theme of this topic does raise
> some questions that easily can be directed at you that I'm sure you'd rather
> not answer.
Yeah, right. Ask away, big fella, and I'll do my best to answer.
Dan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
|
| (...) Yep, completely closed minded, that's me. (URL) admitting that my arguments might not be 100% water tight or that I might be wrong about anything. Oh wait, you were talking about yourself there, and not me, weren't you, since you've never ever (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
|
| (...) (sorry, forgot the Sarcasm on and Sarcasm off warnings)... that is, unless you plan to *never* post about any of the topics you've posted about already. I guess I am *shocked* that you'd try to stifle discussion that way, Dan. But I can see (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
