Subject:
|
Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 18:19:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
506 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Yes indeed, very thoughtful of you.
(sorry, forgot the Sarcasm on and Sarcasm off warnings)... that is, unless
you plan to *never* post about any of the topics you've posted about already.
I guess I am *shocked* that you'd try to stifle discussion that way, Dan.
But I can see why, because the underlying theme of this topic does raise
some questions that easily can be directed at you that I'm sure you'd rather
not answer.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
|
| (...) I feel my sarcasm was well placed since your initial response made it clear that you already stated your stance on this topic in previous discussions in this group, hence nothing that has been presented ever since has swayed your opinion. So (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
