Subject:
|
Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 03:13:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
524 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Daniel Jassim writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> >
> > > Yes indeed, very thoughtful of you.
> >
> > (sorry, forgot the Sarcasm on and Sarcasm off warnings)... that is, unless
> > you plan to *never* post about any of the topics you've posted about already.
>
> I feel my sarcasm was well placed since your initial response made it clear
> that you already stated your stance on this topic in previous discussions in
> this group, hence nothing that has been presented ever since has swayed your
> opinion.
Yep, completely closed minded, that's me.
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=14009
NEVER admitting that my arguments might not be 100% water tight or that I
might be wrong about anything.
Oh wait, you were talking about yourself there, and not me, weren't you,
since you've never ever changed your mind about anything significant, and I
have.
> So what more do you need to say or add, other than to repeat what
> you've said before?
So by those lights, the words "Palestine", "Israel", "US Oppressors" and
most especially "Racist Zionist" need never be uttered by you again here, as
you've said all there is to say about that.
Please.
> But I cannot help but feel skeptical about
> whether you're going to be open-minded about this.
Ditto but x10, based on your track record. Do look at my DebateCard(tm)
score... I *do* change my mind, and admit it without prevarication, if the
case is made strongly enough. Cite where you've ever changed your mind about
anything substantive, will you? Admitting you were wrong in phrasing
something (but not about the central idea) after 17 back and forths of
increasingly disruptive nature doesn't count. (meta: I bet you won't admit
you're wrong about this either... but if you produce a cite, I will)
(gee, maybe we could get Dave to do one for all the major players here. I'd
love to see LFBs... is there a category for being able to overwhelm with
correct, relevant detail???)
> Still, if you feel you've
> previously stated your case clearly before (which I'm assuming you have
> because, to your credit, you're pretty thorough) then you could be gracious
> enough to offer us the links to your old posts on this topic.
They were like, not that far back. Not sure why Dave's searches failed.
> Those who are
> interested in your opinions will read them, those who aren't won't.
>
> > But I can see why, because the underlying theme of this topic does raise
> > some questions that easily can be directed at you that I'm sure you'd rather
> > not answer.
>
> Yeah, right. Ask away, big fella, and I'll do my best to answer.
OK, is the Intifada morally justified? (first under your statement that only
soldiers are targeted, and then under the reality of what actually happens)
Are the actions of Hamas morally justified?
Of Hezbollah?
Of the PA in voicing support for Hamas and Hezbollah, and not trying very
hard to stop them?
Israel *is* the evil racist Zionish occupier of the oppressed Palestinians
after all...
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
|
| (...) You said it, not me. (...) How grand of you, we're truly blessed (sniff sniff). And what exactly am I supposed to change my mind about? (...) You jump, I jump. Each time somebody wants to throw support toward Israel, I'm here for the reality (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
|
| (...) I feel my sarcasm was well placed since your initial response made it clear that you already stated your stance on this topic in previous discussions in this group, hence nothing that has been presented ever since has swayed your opinion. So (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
