 | | Re: Response to Misinformation (Some other perspectives on the tragedy) —Dan Boger
|
| | | (...) let me add to this then - there has _always_ been a jewish settlement in Israel. Way before 1948. And since the late the 1880s, there has been a secular-jewish settlemens in Israel as well. So the UN did not give "a third group" a land that (...) (23 years ago, 15-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Response to Misinformation (Some other perspectives on the tragedy) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Didn't those folks actually go in and buy land from people who they sincerely and with good foundation believed to be the rightful owners at the time (1) rather than settle lands from which the previous owners had been evicted, which is the (...) (23 years ago, 15-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Response to Misinformation (Some other perspectives on the tragedy) —Bill Farkas
|
| | | | | (...) This is what the Romans did to Israel. So which claim is legitimate then? Israel's or the Palestinians? (...) From the governed, do they not? Either by consent or by conceding. At any rate, the governed allow what becomes. (...) But what would (...) (23 years ago, 15-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Response to Misinformation (Some other perspectives on the tragedy) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) [snip] (...) From whence does the 'legitimate ownership' of property arise? I say there is no such thing. Chris (23 years ago, 15-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Response to Misinformation (Some other perspectives on the tragedy) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I can see the argument. But... No matter what? What is the alternative, though? Property belongs to whoever has the bigger gun? (23 years ago, 15-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Response to Misinformation (Some other perspectives on the tragedy) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Actually, I think the notion of ownership of real estate is corrupt not only because we can't possibly track it back to an original "fair" owner and then trace it forward to who ought to own it (for the most part), but also because I think (...) (23 years ago, 16-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
