 | | Re: Some other perspectives on the tragedy —Ross Crawford
|
| | | (...) < (...) So that makes it OK to murder them? (...) Weren't several thousand (est) innocent Americans just murdered for the pursuit of a (as yet unknown) goal? ROSCO (23 years ago, 14-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Some other perspectives on the tragedy —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Jeez, you're willing to go a long way for the sake of equivocation. If they are being used as human shields, then the people using them as shields are responsible for their deaths. So, no--it's not okay to murder them, and the people using (...) (23 years ago, 14-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Some other perspectives on the tragedy —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) murder (...) cross (...) Not the same thing at all. Something closer would be if you buy a baseball bat...and kill me with it you are no more guilty than if you take that same bat and keep swinging it at a pile of baseballs when you know (...) (23 years ago, 14-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Some other perspectives on the tragedy —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Better or worse I will not comment on. I think your example is inapplicable to this situation, but I did want to point out that american law, at any rate, distinguishes between these cases... driving drunk and killing someone is negligent (...) (23 years ago, 14-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
