Subject:
|
Re: National vote on handguns?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Jul 2001 00:48:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
362 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Enrique Durand writes:
> You are absolutely right. In fact, why stop there? Since so many crimes
> involve cars (have you ever heard of a get-away bicycle), we should ban • private
> ownership of cars as well. And since the right to drive is not guaranteed
> anywhere in the Constitution, we don't even have to vote on it. It could just • be
> decreed.
You know what? Not all crimes involve guns. Not all crimes involve cars. But
ALL crimes involve brains. If we made it illegal to possess a brain, ALL crime
would stop. We could remove brains from children as they are born, and within
about eighty years, we'd have no more crime. For all time! A permanent peace
would decend on the world and our ten thousand year crime spree would finally
end.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: National vote on handguns?
|
| (...) Chris brings up a good point in sarcastic kind of way; Is man capable of living in a crime free society? Think back to the story of Eden, only two people and they too committed a crime even though they were living the "perfect" life. I think (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: National vote on handguns?
|
| (...) You are absolutely right. In fact, why stop there? Since so many crimes involve cars (have you ever heard of a get-away bicycle), we should ban private ownership of cars as well. And since the right to drive is not guaranteed anywhere in the (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
110 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
