Subject:
|
Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Jul 2001 21:17:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1162 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
>
> > I suspect that even if there are not specific and precise laws about it there
> > are generally vague laws that could (and would) be used to prosecute the
> > parents under some circumstances if/when pushed by busy-bodies.
>
> Right! We have some impressively vague and unenforced laws. For example,
> apparently Bill Clinton and Gary Condit(1) may both be "sex offenders" under
> DC law, since adultery is illegal in DC. Matters not whether all parties
> involved consent or not..
>
> We need to winnow our laws. Throw out the ones that don't belong, and
> enforce the few remaining consistently.
>
> 1 - For those not up on US news, Rep. Condit had an intern, who has
> disappeared. Although he at first denied it, it is looking more and more
> like that he was having an affair with her (which was in a sense, "cheating"
> on his alleged long term girlfriend... and of course, he and his girlfriend
> were cheating on his wife!)
>
> ++Lar
OK, here's a nicely vague one for you.
http://news.excite.com/news/ap/010704/15/obscene-journal
-Duane
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else)
|
| That's just beyond belief. I can't adequately express the outrage I'm feeling over the stupidity of the judge that actually let this happen (make no mistake, the judge is the only one to blame for this, he has the ultimate power in the case). I (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else)
|
| Hmmmm...I guess I'd better burn all those sci-fi stories I was writing, i'd hate to thrown in prison for starting a war and killing thousands of people...oh and the way some of those people died...I must be deranged to ever have thought such things (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else)
|
| (...) follow-on article at the bottom too, but that is terrible. I mean, the guy is a convicted child molestor, on probation. So, maybe reconsider his probation or schedule some more therapy[1][2] - something appropriate. But to convict him in that (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Laws about sex.... (was something else)
|
| (...) Right! We have some impressively vague and unenforced laws. For example, apparently Bill Clinton and Gary Condit(1) may both be "sex offenders" under DC law, since adultery is illegal in DC. Matters not whether all parties involved consent or (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
