Subject:
|
Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:04:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1083 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Duane Hess writes:
> OK, here's a nicely vague one for you.
>
> http://news.excite.com/news/ap/010704/15/obscene-journal
That is stunning. I'm apalled that that can happen. I suggest you read the
follow-on article at the bottom too, but that is terrible.
I mean, the guy is a convicted child molestor, on probation. So, maybe
reconsider his probation or schedule some more therapy[1][2] - something
appropriate. But to convict him in that way is a gross injustice. It seems
so easy to just take a vague law and apply it any way you please, with the
right spin[3]. That is a frightening violation of civil liberties. I
object to child pornography on the grounds of coercing or mistreating minors
- but how can a work of fiction be criminal in a supposedly free country?
Jason J Railton
(UK)
[1]Okay, this sounds like trivialising it - I don't want to go into what
constitutes appropriate action, just the legal aspect.
[2]Ooh, a footnote. I've gone all Larry for a moment there ;-)
[3]Or do this with the American Constitution - another great source of legal
lunacy.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
