To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 11656
11655  |  11657
Subject: 
Laws about sex.... (was something else)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 13 Jul 2001 17:45:44 GMT
Viewed: 
1144 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:

I suspect that even if there are not specific and precise laws about it there
are generally vague laws that could (and would) be used to prosecute the
parents under some circumstances if/when pushed by busy-bodies.

Right! We have some impressively vague and unenforced laws. For example,
apparently Bill Clinton and Gary Condit(1) may both be "sex offenders" under
DC law, since adultery is illegal in DC. Matters not whether all parties
involved consent or not..

We need to winnow our laws. Throw out the ones that don't belong, and
enforce the few remaining consistently.

1 - For those not up on US news, Rep. Condit had an intern, who has
disappeared. Although he at first denied it, it is looking more and more
like that he was having an affair with her (which was in a sense, "cheating"
on his alleged long term girlfriend... and of course, he and his girlfriend
were cheating on his wife!)

++Lar



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else)
 
(...) OK, here's a nicely vague one for you. (URL) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else)
 
(...) Interesting. It was illegal in England too, under the Puritanic rule of Oliver Cromwell. Curiously though, of all the cases brought to trial throughout London, only one ever secured a conviction - in most cases, the jurors wouldn't register a (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Porn for sex education
 
(...) Some. I'm not really sure what you're asking. Did you want names and addresses? (...) I suspect that even if there are not specific and precise laws about it there are generally vague laws that could (and would) be used to prosecute the (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR