Subject:
|
Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Jul 2001 23:56:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1065 times
|
| |
|
|
Hmmmm...I guess I'd better burn all those sci-fi stories I was writing, i'd
hate to thrown in prison for starting a war and killing thousands of
people...oh and the way some of those people died...I must be deranged to
ever have thought such things and should be safely locked away from society
as I obviously pose a clear and present danger...
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Duane Hess writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> >
> > > I suspect that even if there are not specific and precise laws about it there
> > > are generally vague laws that could (and would) be used to prosecute the
> > > parents under some circumstances if/when pushed by busy-bodies.
> >
> > Right! We have some impressively vague and unenforced laws. For example,
> > apparently Bill Clinton and Gary Condit(1) may both be "sex offenders" under
> > DC law, since adultery is illegal in DC. Matters not whether all parties
> > involved consent or not..
> >
> > We need to winnow our laws. Throw out the ones that don't belong, and
> > enforce the few remaining consistently.
> >
> > 1 - For those not up on US news, Rep. Condit had an intern, who has
> > disappeared. Although he at first denied it, it is looking more and more
> > like that he was having an affair with her (which was in a sense, "cheating"
> > on his alleged long term girlfriend... and of course, he and his girlfriend
> > were cheating on his wife!)
> >
> > ++Lar
>
> OK, here's a nicely vague one for you.
>
> http://news.excite.com/news/ap/010704/15/obscene-journal
>
> -Duane
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
