Subject:
|
Re: Porn for sex education
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Jul 2001 21:15:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
979 times
|
| |
|
|
Christopher Weeks wrote:
> I married a friend...that's what I'd suggest
> to anyone.
I can't agree more on this. Many people think it a cliche, but it's the truth -
"My wife is my best friend"
I wouldn't have it any other way.
> > Same thing goes for messages about oral sex. A lot of the girls
> > have the notion that it's really not sex.
>
> It isn't genital intercourse. And they know it. If it occupies a different
> social rung than genital sex, then it just does. And there's no harm in that.
No, no harm in it, as long as you realize they are in Denial if they think they
aren't having sex when they do anything short of genital intercourse. If they
admit they ARE having sex, just not GI, fine. But denying that oral sex is sex is
just that, denial.
> And it's probably a result of your (you-society at large, not you-Dan)
> represive attitudes anyway...not our illustrious ex-president.
I don't know about that - Clinton certainly didn't help when he tried to move the
line where "sex starts".
--
| Tom Stangl, iPlanet Web Server Technical Support
| Netscape Communications Corp
| A division of AOL Time Warner
| iPlanet Support - http://www.iplanet.com/support/
| Please do not associate my personal views with my employer
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Porn for sex education
|
| (...) Some. I'm not really sure what you're asking. Did you want names and addresses? (...) I suspect that even if there are not specific and precise laws about it there are generally vague laws that could (and would) be used to prosecute the (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
