Debate : 11471


Off-Topic / Debate / 11471	11470 \| 11472

Subject:	Re: Pork chops anyone?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Sun, 8 Jul 2001 04:05:58 GMT
Viewed:	243 times

> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Daniel Jassim writes: > > Warning, not for the squeamish: > > > > http://www.peta.org/pubs/at/a299/pigcase.html > > That's a little better, thanks. By all means, keep reading: http://www.peta-online.org/mc/facts/index.html Did you pass these up the first time around or are these reports the "rhetoric" you were talking about? Dan

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Pork chops anyone?
(...) of them have cites). But they're better than the front page. (...) They appear to be hung off the media link. Not where I'd think to go first were I looking for facts. So no, in my exploring of a very busy and poorly laid out front page, I did (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Pork chops anyone?
(...) I support investigation of this and prosecution if warranted. There are laws on our books against this sort of thing and they need to be enforced. PETA alleges this is pervasive and endemic, (which I'm not convinced they have shown, per se, (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

7 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search