 | | Pork chops anyone?
|
| Warning, not for the squeamish: (URL) (23 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Pork chops anyone?
|
| (...) I support investigation of this and prosecution if warranted. There are laws on our books against this sort of thing and they need to be enforced. PETA alleges this is pervasive and endemic, (which I'm not convinced they have shown, per se, (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Visit to a slaughterhouse
|
| Warning, not for the squeamish: (URL) (23 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Slaughterhouse images
|
| Warning, not for the squeamish: (URL) (23 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Pork chops anyone?
|
| (...) And it certainly wouldn't help the cruel treatment of other animals which aren't bred for meat. I don't have any links, but I volunteered at the RSPCA (Royal Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) for several years, and have seen photos (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Pork chops anyone?
|
| (...) By all means, keep reading: (URL) you pass these up the first time around or are these reports the "rhetoric" you were talking about? Dan (23 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Pork chops anyone?
|
| (...) of them have cites). But they're better than the front page. (...) They appear to be hung off the media link. Not where I'd think to go first were I looking for facts. So no, in my exploring of a very busy and poorly laid out front page, I did (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
