To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 113
112  |  114
Subject: 
Re: Ldraw cannon
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 7 Dec 1998 15:23:17 GMT
Viewed: 
3743 times
  
<366A0E48.901D7C85@ctp.IWANTNOSPAM.com> <F3J7pC.EGt@lugnet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I've read through most of the responses to this, and I have to add that
the Unemployment level directly affects the 'going' wage in a locale.
Take for instance, Fargo ND, we currently have about 1.8% statewide
unemployment, but in Fargo, we have about 0.8% or so ...

What that means, is that the minimum wage is disregarded, and a 'going'
wage is established.  Currently, I could go almost anywhere in town and
'demand' about $6.50/hr starting ... at least, FYI MW is $5.25/hr ... and
that's
fast food.  If you get into more skilled labor, or office type work, starting
would be much closer to $8.00/hr.

True, there are exceptions to the 'going' wages, for instance a truly entry
level
job, or a job designed and staffed by school age kids.

Another thing in this type of economy, is that employees will leave for $0.25
difference.  That makes a big difference.  When an employer knows that
he has an employee that would leave for a little difference, he will pay more
because training a new person is expensive.

-Lee.


Jesse Long wrote:

> Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <366A0E48.901D7C85@ctp.IWANTNOSPAM.com>...
> > 
> > Minimum wage CAUSES unemployment. Followups to .debate not .fun...
> 
> 
> You could at least explain that if you're going to toss it out.  Lots of
> people don't believe it.  Apparently people think employers will just fork
> out more moeny and not cut any jobs.
> 
> Jesse



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Ldraw cannon
 
(...) I have a shooting cannon in my to-render-bucket, but unfortunately, it has low priority. Also, at the Tracked Parts List at (URL) it says: 3 Cannon Zach Coakley Planning to Work On 1/7/98 I'll never learn if that means January 7th or July (...) (28 years ago, 6-Nov-98, to lugnet.cad)

94 Messages in This Thread:















































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR