Subject:
|
Re: Is this sexism?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Jun 2001 23:06:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
425 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> David Eaton wrote:
> > So, if they DON'T choose it, is it sexist/unfair to give women paid time
> > off?
>
> PAID time off? If you don't also give Paternity leave, yes, it is. And that
> still makes it unfair to those that choose not to have kids.
Alright-- I'll ask a little more directly: what does the act of choosing
have to do with it? Should those who *didn't* choose to have kids have
negative reprecussions? Should those that *did* have negative repercussions?
Should those negative reprecussions (if extant) be different between those
who did and didn't choose that way?
DaveE
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Is this sexism?
|
| (...) (not picking on Dave E per se, he's asking good questions) Why isn't this a matter for employers to choose? In an ideal world, shouldn't employers be able to decide they want their company to be family friendly and offer a palette of benefits (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Is this sexism?
|
| (...) PAID time off? If you don't also give Paternity leave, yes, it is. And that still makes it unfair to those that choose not to have kids. (...) Yes, it would be a choice, assuming that miracle pill had zero side effects for anyone. (...) (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
244 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
