To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 11257
11256  |  11258
Subject: 
Re: Is this sexism?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 29 Jun 2001 01:30:10 GMT
Viewed: 
1424 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> > David Eaton wrote:
> > > So, if they DON'T choose it, is it sexist/unfair to give women paid time
> > > off?
> > 
> > PAID time off?  If you don't also give Paternity leave, yes, it is.  And that
> > still makes it unfair to those that choose not to have kids.
> 
> Alright-- I'll ask a little more directly: what does the act of choosing
> have to do with it? Should those who *didn't* choose to have kids have
> negative reprecussions? Should those that *did* have negative repercussions?
> Should those negative reprecussions (if extant) be different between those
> who did and didn't choose that way?

(not picking on Dave E per se, he's asking good questions)

Why isn't this a matter for employers to choose? In an ideal world,
shouldn't employers be able to decide they want their company to be family
friendly and offer a palette of benefits that attract families, or
conversely, decide that they want their company to be a party happy place
and offer a palette of benefits that attract swinging singles?

Let the market decide which employers get more effective workers (and thus
prosper).

++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Is this sexism?
 
(...) I think that would be what I'd suggest. It's up to the company to decide whether or not to undertake such a policy. If they pull it off, great! But my personal guess is that any company that tries it is liable to get a mouthful of abuse with (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Is this sexism?
 
(...) Alright-- I'll ask a little more directly: what does the act of choosing have to do with it? Should those who *didn't* choose to have kids have negative reprecussions? Should those that *did* have negative repercussions? Should those negative (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

244 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR