Subject:
|
Re: Is it ~OK~ for government to subsidise profit making industry?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:11:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
162 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> Occasionally, I am in favour of government intervention in the employment
> market. Despite that, when I read the story below, I thought this was the
> one area where companies and individuals did not need handouts / subsidies.
> Can it really be ~OK~ for government to subsidise profit making industry(?)
> in this way?
>
> The Story:
> California tells jobless 'Go east' and pays for the journey for relocation
> In the Depression years of the 30s, tens of thousands of unemployed left the
> Dust Bowl of America in Oklahoma and its neighbouring states and headed west
> for California in search of work, their plight captured by John Steinbeck in
> The Grapes of Wrath and by the haunting photographs of Dorothea Lange.
>
> But now the impoverished unemployed in California are heading east -
> encouraged by a controversial scheme that gives people on welfare a one-way
> ticket to leave their homes and look for jobs elsewhere.
>
> The rest is here:
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4206891,00.html
My hunch would be that the State is trying to protect it's own interests.
It's probably cheaper to move the welfare recipient to another location with
an open job market than try to find them a job in an area with a tight job
market, and supporting them the whole time.
I don't necessarily agree with it, but it does make sense.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|