 | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (...) Since I share Bruce's misgivings on this subject, I'll mention a few thoughts, too. The validity or invalidity of the LP's views is, of course, wholly independent of the racial, cultural, age, or gender makeup of the party, but that's not what (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Let's dig into that a bit... Is that an accurate supposition? That is, *are* there things that are "good for you" that you wouldn't necessarily choose to do? We know that's true in the individual case, right? I know that exercising more and (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) I have no idea what the SCLC is, so I have no real opinion on it. (...) One could argue that you are using your memebership fee to invest in a Libertarian future. Your fellow members may hope for a return on that investment in the longer or (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) Indeed. The notion that a bunch of white guys can sit around constructing a libertarian dreamland which will be on benefit to all is a complete anathema to me. Scott A (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) Yup, that's pretty much it - and let me add that I don't regard the Libertarian Party as a white supremacist group in the slightest. I'd said what I did in part because I think the Libertarian Party *for it's own benefit* needs to address the (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Libertarian Propaganda (was incorrectly referred to as SPAM elsewhere in the thread) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Let's stipulate that, for the sake of discussion. What can be done? Or that is, how far can the LP go? Remember that the LP is the "Party of Principle". A lot of big internal spats happen because some action or message is proposed which seems (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Libertarian Propaganda (was incorrectly referred to as SPAM elsewhere in the thread) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> ** bump ** (from UBB boards, the practice of replying to something that you hoped would get a reply so that the thread floats to the top of the list of things again) (23 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
