To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *9776 (-10)
  Re: The play's the thing (was Re: Does God have a name for God have a name for God....)
 
(...) No matter what the result is, there will always be someone eager to: Misinterpret it. Fake it. Believe it happened according to his own pet theory. Robert (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Courtesy? (was: lots of other stuff)
 
(...) Well, I'm not interested in getting into your other debate, but I disagree with your opinion on this point. I think that is *exactly* the *difference* between courtesy & respect - one is given freely, the other is earned. ROSCO (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
 
(...) It's probably using the reference header to sort them instead of the subject. Just out of curiosity, what news reader are you using? Seems odd that it should randomly put spaces into the subject line. o_O (...) Gee, PKB lames, have ye reached (...) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The play's the thing (was Re: Does God have a name for God have a name for God....)
 
(...) Just try & cool it Robert. It may sound like that to you, but yours is only one opinion. (...) No, some may have followed your links - that doesn't imply they know who you are. ROSCO (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Is Robert Bevens exceedingly obnoxious? (was: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years...))
 
(...) Uh, excuse your stupidity, but after doing it just once, one should be able to tell it breaks the thread apart...unless they're just blind or stupid, and I sure as heck wouldn't ever call Jennifer stupid. I mean if you're having such a (...) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Carl Sagan's "Cosmos"
 
(...) They did a show about him on the Biography channel, it was quite good. They showed some of the SNL takes and such. Aparently the "Cosmos" series was one of the biggest it public television history. Robert (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The play's the thing (was Re: Does God have a name for God have a name for God....)
 
(...) No, not really. (...) You make it sound as if I've gone to some great length to hide my identity. A couple weeks ago I posted some links to pictures of some of my models, two new, and one old. So anyone following my work would obviously know (...) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Carl Sagan's "Cosmos"
 
(...) 100% not true. Actually, it was the WAY Sagan said "billions" that got him into trouble. When he did the "Cosmos" TV series, Sagan over pronounced the "B" in billions so that it wouldn't sound like "millions." It was so noticable that people (...) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Carl Sagan's "Cosmos"
 
(...) old: (...) And I thought it was nice when NASA named the Mars lander after him (URL) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Carl Sagan's "Cosmos"
 
(...) Every other word out of his mouth was "billions and billions." He must have said it....billions and billions of times! Bruce (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR