To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 9770
9769  |  9771
Subject: 
Re: The play's the thing (was Re: Does God have a name for God have a name for God....)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 4 Apr 2001 05:57:28 GMT
Reply-To: 
q_harlequin_p@hotmail*stopspammers*.com
Viewed: 
5058 times
  
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001 13:05:30 GMT, "Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com>
wrote:

> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
> > > I'm not a God, I just understand human psychology, that and I can
> > > calculate things.  Anyone can do it, it's just a matter of shutting up
> > > for 5 minutes, analyzing your opponent and then calculating expected
> > > responses.
> > 
> > Hmmmm. Robert, you're really starting to sound like someone else who came
> > around here temporarily a while back - what was his name? Matthew Boulton? I'd
> > almost forgotten.....

>  At this point a general warning should be given that in the near future
> Robert will likely announce that he has been playing a game with us to see
> how we'd react.

No, not really.

> I, for one, feel greatly privileged to have been a part of
> this bold and unprecedented experiment in human behavior.  Bravo, Robert!
> 
>     Dave!

You make it sound as if I've gone to some great length to hide my
identity.  A couple weeks ago I posted some links to pictures of some
of my models, two new, and one old.  So anyone following my work would
obviously know who I am.

Robert



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The play's the thing (was Re: Does God have a name for God have a name for God....)
 
(...) Just try & cool it Robert. It may sound like that to you, but yours is only one opinion. (...) No, some may have followed your links - that doesn't imply they know who you are. ROSCO (25 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  The play's the thing (was Re: Does God have a name for God have a name for God....)
 
(...) At this point a general warning should be given that in the near future Robert will likely announce that he has been playing a game with us to see how we'd react. I, for one, feel greatly privileged to have been a part of this bold and (...) (25 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

137 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR