Subject:
|
Re: The play's the thing (was Re: Does God have a name for God have a name for God....)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 4 Apr 2001 05:57:28 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
q_harlequin_p@hotmailSPAMLESS.com
|
Viewed:
|
2931 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001 13:05:30 GMT, "Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com>
wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
> > > I'm not a God, I just understand human psychology, that and I can
> > > calculate things. Anyone can do it, it's just a matter of shutting up
> > > for 5 minutes, analyzing your opponent and then calculating expected
> > > responses.
> >
> > Hmmmm. Robert, you're really starting to sound like someone else who came
> > around here temporarily a while back - what was his name? Matthew Boulton? I'd
> > almost forgotten.....
> At this point a general warning should be given that in the near future
> Robert will likely announce that he has been playing a game with us to see
> how we'd react.
No, not really.
> I, for one, feel greatly privileged to have been a part of
> this bold and unprecedented experiment in human behavior. Bravo, Robert!
>
> Dave!
You make it sound as if I've gone to some great length to hide my
identity. A couple weeks ago I posted some links to pictures of some
of my models, two new, and one old. So anyone following my work would
obviously know who I am.
Robert
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
137 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
