Subject:
|
Re: The play's the thing (was Re: Does God have a name for God have a name for God....)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 4 Apr 2001 06:39:32 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
q_harlequin_p@hotmail.com+StopSpam+
|
Viewed:
|
2954 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001 15:29:23 GMT, "Jason J. Railton"
<j.j.railton@cwcom.net> wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
> > > > I'm not a God, I just understand human psychology, that and I can
> > > > calculate things. Anyone can do it, it's just a matter of shutting up
> > > > for 5 minutes, analyzing your opponent and then calculating expected
> > > > responses.
> > >
> > > Hmmmm. Robert, you're really starting to sound like someone else who came
> > > around here temporarily a while back - what was his name? Matthew Boulton? I'd
> > > almost forgotten.....
> >
> > At this point a general warning should be given that in the near future
> > Robert will likely announce that he has been playing a game with us to see
> > how we'd react. I, for one, feel greatly privileged to have been a part of
> > this bold and unprecedented experiment in human behavior. Bravo, Robert!
> >
> > Dave!
>
> Hmmm again. So, if he's actually _trying_ to come across as a complete
> failure, and in that, he's a resounding success, which is he?
>
> Jason
No matter what the result is, there will always be someone eager to:
Misinterpret it.
Fake it.
Believe it happened according to his own pet theory.
Robert
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
137 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
