 | | Re: Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
|
|
(...) Let the police deal with the criminals. My bank and the government can keep their noses out of my damned business. (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <371274B4.E66CE6CE@v...er.net>... (...) God help us if we put some controls in place to deter criminal activity... Jesse ___...___ Jesse The Jolly Jingoist Looking for answers? Read the rec.toys.lego FAQ! (URL) in (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
|
|
(...) Hrmmm, not being into the political scene much anymore, I gave www.congress.gov a shot. It brought me to (URL) I've never seen before but seems pretty darn cool. Anyway, from there I decided to look at Legislation in the 106th Congress, and (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
|
|
(...) I am surprised, but pleasantly so. I had assumed that an e-mail petition would not be taken seriously due to several technical issues. Wow. :-, (...) Do you have a URL pointing to more info on Ron Paul's bill? Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
|
|
(...) See my sig. 170K of the comments (out of 250K or so, 99+% against) were originated at the site I reference. But the battle is not over, there are plans afoot to do it anyway, rebadged and repackaged. Support Ron Paul's (R-TX) bill preventing (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
|
|
There was a discussion, either here or in RTL, about the proposed "Know Your Customer Rule" that was designed to alleviate Money Laundering. The proposal has been withdrawn due to "...an unprecedented number of comments on the proposal from the (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Motorized 5571
|
|
Looks like he is using a second RCX. Bob Fay rfay@we.mediaone.net The Shop (URL) Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message news:36FFF57A.2F2D43...ger.net... (...) detailed (...) by (...) a (...) car... (...) <F97y7L.Dvz@lugnet.com> (...) ... (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Motorized 5571
|
|
(...) Er, ah, never mind. I see it was done with 2 RCXs and IR communication. How well does that work non-line of sight? What would be really cool would be to build a steering wheel coupled to a rotation sensor (geared way down so one wheel turn is (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Motorized 5571
|
|
How did you RC it? I have motorized a number of Technic models, including using a Micro motor to allow steering, but have always used a battery box and long connector wires to control it. (...) Larry Pieniazek (URL) Know your Customer is wounded, (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Motorized 5571
|
|
Was: RE: Who had the 5571 Inventory? I just got my 5571 last week and it was not only a very cool and detailed model, but a lot of fun to modify! I made it into a very cool RC Truck by adding a steering motor and a motor to the rear wheel carriage. (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build)
|
