 | | Re: Thanks a lot Pieniazek! (was Re: Something not right...)
|
|
(...) The Sistine Chapel is a great piece of work. Dan's comic was a cute piece of work. (...) Are you disputing that Dan should have the right to alter his work? Or are you disputing that Larry should have the right to his opinion? (...) Us who? In (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | The artist hasn't the courage of his convictions? (was Re: The Censors have won.
|
|
(...) My goodness that *does* miss the point. I don't know whether anyone else who was engaged in honest dialog about whether violence against fantasy characters was useful/appropriate/good fun or not was asking for change, but *I* never asked for (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Distaste for Jar-Jar (was: The Censors have won.)
|
|
Words obviously spoken by a man without small kids. Barney (and Elmo) is an hour of uninterrupted time in which you can actually get something done. With Elmo or Barney gracing the screen I can supervise with one eye and be doing something else. (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Distaste for Jar-Jar (was: The Censors have won.)
|
|
(...) Maybe, rather than taking the "offensive" stuff out altogether, something like this could accompany future comic strips right at the beginning, as part of a disclaimer explaining that it is SATIRE against the offensive marketing engine that (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Thanks a lot Pieniazek! (was Re: Something not right...)
|
|
Now Dan Jassim has chosen to omit the scenes from a great piece of work because you and your cohorts found it offensive. Its great that conservatives like you can suck the fun out everything for us. Do me a favor and avoid www.3-stooges.com lest you (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Something not right about Captain Ahnee and the Dipwads?
|
|
(...) I haven't called for ANY sentient beings to be ground up, thanks. JarJar isn't a sentient being. He's not subject to evolution. He's a cgi construct created to sell toys and toothbrushes and bedsheets. He's fictional. Not Real. Make Believe. (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Something not right about Captain Ahnee and the Dipwads?
|
|
Deliberately quoted out of context... (...) That's an intolerant viewpoint. I'm sorry, but it is. JarJar is lame, he's stupid, he's annoying, I'd choose not to associate with him, but I'm not calling for anyone to be ground up for pig food. Even in (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Something not right about Captain Ahnee and the Dipwads?
|
|
(...) Well,I think JarJar should be ground up for pig food. Does that make him a minority? I didn't hate any of the other Gungans, so I don't think so. (...) The biggest problem I have with the PC movement is that it has gotten so extreme. I'm (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Demented Jar-Jar humour (was: Something not right about Captain Ahnee and the Dipwads?)
|
|
(...) Lar-Lar, are you saying it's time to put a lid lid on all this Jar-Jar humour? ;-) --Todd (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC?
|
|
(...) Hrmmm - I think I may actually have several 6444's in my Lego room. Probably take me a few more months worth of working my way through the piles of unopened sets to part out and sell before I can find them, but I know I picked up several on (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
