 | | Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
|
|
(...) Unless you just read it for the "articles". Sarcasm, Larry. I was being sarcastic, hence the winking smiley after the statement. You could be no more religious than I could be an American. Can I surmise that the rest of my post was so (...) (24 years ago, 12-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
|
|
(...) I've said that before, you could look it up. It's not exactly a quote as I believe the quote is more along the lines of: 'Then the LORD said to Cain, "Where is your brother Abel?" "I don't know," he replied. "Am I my brother's keeper?"' (NIV (...) (24 years ago, 12-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
|
|
(...) I would go one step further. Venereal diseases have been around (and have been known about) for a lot longer than AIDS has been on the scene. Most are curable, some are not, and not all are limited in transmission to sexual contact. My point (...) (24 years ago, 12-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
|
|
(...) fund (...) That's a Hobson's choice, and a really unrealistic one to boot. But if it will get you to answer much more important questions, OK. Assuming those are the only two possible alternative answers (which they aren't, there are tons of (...) (24 years ago, 12-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
|
|
(...) in (...) Leave it to a scaly Libertarian to carp!! And anytime you wanna slug it out, I'm ready for you. I'll snail you with my left hook. Don't be so conchy, you'll get the baiting of your life. Yea, I wrote bass, I meant viol. (24 years ago, 12-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
|
|
(...) I may be wrong, but I think Larry's answer to this question will be similar to mine. If I were to agree that we should be funding SS & Medicaid/Medicare at all (and for the most part I don't) I might agree that money spent on research to find (...) (24 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: [snip] (...) that (...) to (...) to (...) You'll get my answers once you have answered my question (which YOU have refused to answer and I am now asking now for the THIRD time) - Most AIDS victims (...) (24 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: positive impeachment
|
|
(...) clogged (...) Dan Quayle for president, baby! Tanned, rested, ready, and too dim to cause any trouble. ++Lar (24 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: May Day "riots" in London
|
|
(...) never (...) infrastructure. (...) Oh, sorry about this but.... I agree with you. And with Alex. You're talking about armed insurrection and you are as usual, spot on. Alex is talking about law abiding peaceful demonstration and he is right as (...) (24 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: positive impeachment
|
|
(...) Been there, done that. Or at least the California Republicans have. Sorta. They had a one vote edge in one of the two state houses and were exultantant that they would finally replace the demonized Willy Brown as Speaker of the House with one (...) (24 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
