 | | Re: PW validation terms/labels
|
|
(...) For the average person or script kiddle to crack a 4-digit PIN via brute force, they'd have to: (1) first actually get someone's card; and then (2) manually try out up to 10,000 combinations, and IIRC, ATM's are programmed to eat cards after a (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
|
|
(...) I like this idea. I really hope the marketting world starts to realize the value of targetted advertising. I would happily fill out a fairly detailed survey if I felt that it's use would be to make sure I received only mail I am interested in. (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: PW validation terms/labels
|
|
(...) Perhaps part of the problem is the relative weights attached to various elements of strength of passwords. I would generally agree that a 4 character password should not be accepted (of course I suspect most of us have a significant amount of (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bill Gates' real crime...
|
|
(...) Investors (...) behave (...) just (...) Two wrongs make a right? And I see lots of systems at my job that have unix, not windows. (...) I really don't want to sit and enumerate all of Microsoft's trangressions. It's a big, sprawling, complex (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bill Gates' real crime...
|
|
(...) While MS may have had some anti-competitive practices, I haven't seen anything which justifies a breakup. Some thoughts of mine on some of the issues which have been raised: - MS billing vendors for a copy of Windows for every machine sold: Do (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Murderer Reno's real crime...
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> I'm not sure what's your point here? Are you saying that the gov should have let microsoft be, even though the court decided it was breaking the law, just because a lot of people own it's stock? (...) Since when do we (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bill Gates' real crime...
|
|
It seemed to me a pretty clear-cut case of monopolistic practices. Investors big and small should have seen this coming miles away. Microsoft even got a previous wake up call, dodged the bullet on penalties, and proceeded to behave as arrogantly as (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Murderer Reno's real crime...
|
|
(...) Right. But people who sold early, like me, did better than those who had a reasonable expectation of a reasonable government. I know better, of course. The poor shlubs who waited really did see a decrease in their wealth after they sold their (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Murderer Reno's real crime...
|
|
(...) An increase in a share price is not "real wealth". Nor is a decrease. Neither is "real" until you sell the shares. (...) Emotional button-push alert! Who knows where Microsoft stock - and its competitors stock - will go in the future. In the (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Pax Americana (was Re: Where did you lot spring from?)
|
|
(...) I think that the best chocolate in the world is those guylian sea shells. (25 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
