|
|
 | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) Trying to be seen as a leftist, may be, but I'm not sure about the possibility of being a "leftist" and "1st lady of USA" at the same time. Anyway, it was not the point. Your attitude about this subject (continuously ranting about "leftists" (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) part (...) I can't recall a single liberal in my acquaintance that thinks this way. Yes, you will run into this line of reasoning in some black studies courses, but I don't think you will find too many people who buy into it. Bruce (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: An idea set ...
|
| (...) Interesting question. But it's off topic for off-topic.. :-) ++Lar (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
| | | | | An idea set ...
|
| If you were to make up a set of exactly 100 lego bricks/pieces, what would the set consist of, and what kind of container would you use or design for it? The container is not one of the 100 pieces. For the sake of clarification, lets assume that the (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| Larry, (...) I am. Just got a little steamed under the collar. (...) According to liberal thinking, yes! (...) diversity. I guess I better get reprogrammed into compliance with liberal / diversity thinking. Scott S. (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Ad hominem attacks
|
| (...) I like that coinage. <snipped what I agree with> (...) If there were a substantive difference in kind between the GOP and the Dems I'd say maybe. But there isn't, and I fear Dubya has cronies of his own. Perhaps they won't be as venal as the (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Ad hominem attacks
|
| (...) It seems that McCarthyism (spelling?) has returned to America. Or, perhaps, we could coin a more modern phrase: Agendaism. Our society, by in large, has abandoned a belief in principles of objective truth that have a moral imperative upon our (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) Note that I think Scott is speaking in the abstract here, he's not accusing Sel of being leftist per se. (...) NO WAY! You can only be a racist if you're a male WASP. Everyone else is part of the oppressed, and therefore, by definition, can't (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| Selçuk, (...) Well, sir, when you exhibit classical signs of leftism, I will cal you a leftist. IF you don't like Gulliani, fine, but calling him a Nazi is typical liberal / Democratic rhetoric. If a call Al Sharpton a racist, then I am at fault, (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) Yet it is easy to demonstrate that liberals are leftist and marxist, while the label of nazi is not at all applicable to Giulliani. Applying the label correctly is not hyperboly. Applying a label incorrectly, when it doesn't remotely ressemble (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
