 | | Re: New policy for LS@h
|
|
(...) I was referring to the "people would not notice nearly as much". (...) No. I don't. Why is there a difference? You've still never explained that, all you say is "that should be selfevident". Why do you not trust government? It is made up of (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: IP (was: Re: Any suggestions on a homepage?)
|
|
(...) Ah, right. I read your post as saying that it was OK to cut and paste HTML code[1], though not content itself. (...) A.C. Doyle? Quite probably something is wrong. It's just that I can't manage to see it either, which is why I asked you. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Some auction pages just hurt your eyes.
|
|
(...) I think what I'd most like to see are ebay "preferred forms" to still allow users to select which they'd like the most (also show the popularity of each form), and alternatively (if you REALLY want your own format) you can do it, but a little (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Some auction pages just hurt your eyes.
|
|
(...) Yes! Or maybe ridiculous price, stay away!, etc. ;) Scott S. (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
|
(...) Yes. The problem is complex, though: If you go back to a small community (say, max cities out at 100k inhabitants.), can you still sustain technology at out current level, and rise beyond that? Are million-plus-inhabitant cities a necessary (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Some auction pages just hurt your eyes.
|
|
He said... (...) limited to (...) single (...) I said... (...) listings (...) Buyers can (...) Someone else said... (...) True. (...) Also, true. Maybe they could put a little *annoying* gif next to the listing like *hot*, *gallery*, etc. -Rob. (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
|
Richard Franks wrote in message ... (...) think (...) For things done while they were in power, sure. Although I'm not sure how statute of limitations should play in, though the only things which should have a statute of limitations are things for (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
|
(...) Yup, one would - and that is the current set-up. But I believe(1) that I was responding to an impression that governments are evil because they'll do this, but corporations aren't, because they won't. James (URL) hunting through the thread for (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
|
(...) :O We agree on a lot more than just that.. but the differences define us, so to speak. Richard (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
|
(...) We've all got to stop *agreeing* like this or people will talk. (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
|
(...) Heh :) I don't have anything against Mark though. Lurking in this newsgroup and listen to us prattle on argumentively about nothing is enough to drive *anyone* to a few chosen comments. We've probably been trolling him! Richard (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
|
(...) How did you arrive at that number? That's my point. (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
|
<387CF961.42F012A7@c...anweb.net> <FoAIpx.I2u@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) I would tend to say both are equally valid. However governments have monopoly on the initiation of the use of (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
|
(...) Maybe we can lynch him with a wet noodle, thereby combining your sentiment and Richard's... Dave! (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
|
(...) At last, an artistic sentiment that Richard and I can agree on! But lynching's a bit much, though. (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
|
(...) Good. Similarly, I hope that the experience of being lumped in with other less pleasant groups for your views will grant you some sympathy for, say, environmentalists, not all of which are "worship the earth as our godess" pagans. -- (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
|
(...) The outrage! 50 lashes with a wet noodle. I don't care for his politics 100% but that man(? or whatever he is :-) ) has never been afraid to take chances artistically. Ziggy is on my 20 best albums of all time list. (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
|
(...) Any tax, across the board, incents some behaviours and disincents others. Broadly, there seem to be at least three classes of taxation, although there may be others. These are: Income - a tax on the production of wealth Sales - a tax on the (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
|
(...) In the interests of not repeating myself: (URL) I don't think individuals have (in the general case) enough resources for personal liability to be feasable/sufficient. An example of this occured recently in Alberta - a number of people were (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
|
(...) This is turning into a lynch-mob! (...) Well in that case I'll find a sturdy branch.. Richard (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
