Subject:
|
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 18 Jan 2000 18:35:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4828 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> <388320C1.F3E0E6D1@eclipse.net> <FoHr3F.Isu@lugnet.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> James Brown wrote:
> >
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> > >
> > > Governments, corporations, charities, people, etc. will all (in general)
> > > take and use as much power as is given to them. But as Scott pointed
> > > out, we don't give corporations the power to abuse us to the same
> > > degree. Or at least in the same ways.
> >
> > Yes, but in my understanding (which I'm willing to admit may be flawed) a
> > Libertarian system would grant corporations much more power than they
> > currently experience.
>
> In some ways that might be true. In others, and I think these are more
> important, corporations would be severely limited to fair play. If
> decision makers were personally held civilly and criminally liable for
> their actions, they would think twice about the behaviors they have
> their companies engage in.
>
> The current system requires companies to do what's profitable for the
> shareholders in the short term. This means that if they can make a buck
> doing something immoral, they often will. If, in addition to whatever
> the company could be sued for, the president, CEO, board of directors,
> and potentially stock holders could be held jointly and severally
> liable, companies would never hurt people in ways that could come back
> to haunt them.
In the interests of not repeating myself:
http://www.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=3742
Also, I don't think individuals have (in the general case) enough resources
for personal liability to be feasable/sufficient. An example of this occured
recently in Alberta - a number of people were infected with Hepatitis C from
improperly screened blood. With the people involved getting (IMHO) a
reasonable settlement, the sheer number of people made the settlement HUGE(1)
- well beyond the means of the vast majority of company officers/gov't
officials.
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
1: 1.1 billion, IIRC
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) As another example, look at the people that AIDS from blood transfusions, while there were already good indications that HIV was transmitted through blood-contact ("it hasn't been proven yet that HIV causes AIDS!" (which is still true)), and (...) (27 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| <388320C1.F3E0E6D1@eclipse.net> <FoHr3F.Isu@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) In some ways that might be true. In others, and I think these are more important, corporations would be (...) (27 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
